Procurement Professor

Editorial standards

The publication-wide rules that govern accuracy, attribution, independence, review, automation, and corrections.

The central standard

Publish useful, supportable information; show readers where material facts came from; separate evidence from interpretation; and correct meaningful errors transparently.

Accuracy and context

Substantive factual claims should be supported by the strongest reasonably available evidence. Statistics retain their population, geography, period, units, denominator, and limitations. Legal or policy coverage distinguishes proposals, guidance, enacted requirements, effective dates, and expired measures. Company statements remain attributed to the company unless independently verified.

Attribution and original work

Primary sources are preferred when they can directly support the claim. Material claims receive nearby citations and a visible source record. Original Procurement Professor tools, frameworks, and calculations disclose their method, assumptions, version, intended use, and limitations. Editorial synthesis is labeled by context and is not presented as a third party’s finding.

Authorship and review

Shared research uses the truthful Editorial Desk byline. Named contributors are credited only for work they actually contribute. Matt Bogoroch is identified as editor where he is accountable for review. Publication dates, modification dates, and change histories are shown where they help readers assess currency.

Independence and conflicts

Payment does not determine editorial participation or conclusions. Sponsorship, affiliate relationships, supplied data, and material conflicts must be disclosed. Commercially connected links receive appropriate treatment. Inclusion, citation, comparison, job-board collection, or linking is not an endorsement.

AI and automation

Automated tools may assist discovery, transcription, classification, drafting, structured data, and quality checks. They are not evidence and do not replace accountable human review. Conceptual AI-assisted images are labeled, credited, and recorded in the image provenance register.

Corrections and enforcement

Material challenges are reviewed against the cited evidence and the more detailed research methodology. Confirmed errors are corrected promptly and important meaning-changing updates receive a visible history note. The corrections policy explains what to submit and what readers can expect.

Page history
  1. Initial publication-wide editorial standards published.